http://www.peoplebuilding.co.uk/1517/using-the-law-of-attraction-to-manifest-money/ Motivating Change to Create Inspirational Lives Sun, 25 Dec 2011 21:55:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.peoplebuilding.co.uk/1517/using-the-law-of-attraction-to-manifest-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34 Gemma Bailey Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:25:38 +0000 http://www.peoplebuilding.co.uk/?p=1517#comment-34 Doofus you should check out the podcast that went with this http://peoplebuilding.mypodcast.com Doofus you should check out the podcast that went with this http://peoplebuilding.mypodcast.com

]]> http://www.peoplebuilding.co.uk/1517/using-the-law-of-attraction-to-manifest-money/comment-page-1/#comment-33 Doofus Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:48:23 +0000 http://www.peoplebuilding.co.uk/?p=1517#comment-33 The Law of Attraction does indeed work, and used correctly is an incredibly powerful tool. The movie "The Secret" is simply one representation of the Law of Attraction, which was purposefully simplified and sensationalized to appeal to as many people as possible and to spread the word to as many people as possible. "The Secret" is just a collection of different theorists, promoters and self-help "gurus" who use the Law of Attraction in their work. Rhonda Byrne simply took the ideas of all of these theorists and "experts" and presented her interpretation of the Law of Attraction in the movie. (the book by the way is simply a spin off of the movie itself). So the representation of the Law of Attraction is simply Rhonda Byrne's interpretation, she is not a self-help guru, or a teacher, she is simply a TV producer who made a documentary. The final representation of the Law of Attraction in the film is not one that is shared by all of the "Secret Teachers" , in fact pretty much all of the experts that contributed to the film disagree with at least one aspect, if not many aspects of how Byrne presented the Law of Attraction in the film. And indeed, most of the "Secret Teachers" that featured in the film do not share the same ideas or beliefs as each other. Some favour Byrne's approach of sensationalizing and making the Law of Attraction appear almost magical. This is not as dishonest as it may first appear, many authors, including one of the most famous (Wallace D Wattles) deliberately created a sense of magic around the concept to appeal to the masses... the idea being that by creating the illusion of something simple, magical and powerful people would be more likely to give it a go, and put it into practise (strange as it may seem). Other "teachers" featured in the film mix the concept with that of Christianity. While many of them explain the idea (which most people actually believe to be the real explanation), as a tool to direct an incredibly powerful tool ... the subconscious mind. And many of them have criticized Byrne since the release of the film, as she failed to leave out the most important part of the Law, which is of course ACTION. I could write so much more, but basically what I am trying to say is that you have to seperate The Law of Attraction from the movie The Secret, they are not the same thing. The Secret was flawed in many ways, but many people will benefit from it, if they use it as a springboard for further reading on the subject. The Law of Attraction does indeed work, and used correctly is an incredibly powerful tool. The movie “The Secret” is simply one representation of the Law of Attraction, which was purposefully simplified and sensationalized to appeal to as many people as possible and to spread the word to as many people as possible. “The Secret” is just a collection of different theorists, promoters and self-help “gurus” who use the Law of Attraction in their work. Rhonda Byrne simply took the ideas of all of these theorists and “experts” and presented her interpretation of the Law of Attraction in the movie. (the book by the way is simply a spin off of the movie itself). So the representation of the Law of Attraction is simply Rhonda Byrne’s interpretation, she is not a self-help guru, or a teacher, she is simply a TV producer who made a documentary. The final representation of the Law of Attraction in the film is not one that is shared by all of the “Secret Teachers” , in fact pretty much all of the experts that contributed to the film disagree with at least one aspect, if not many aspects of how Byrne presented the Law of Attraction in the film. And indeed, most of the “Secret Teachers” that featured in the film do not share the same ideas or beliefs as each other. Some favour Byrne’s approach of sensationalizing and making the Law of Attraction appear almost magical. This is not as dishonest as it may first appear, many authors, including one of the most famous (Wallace D Wattles) deliberately created a sense of magic around the concept to appeal to the masses… the idea being that by creating the illusion of something simple, magical and powerful people would be more likely to give it a go, and put it into practise (strange as it may seem).
Other “teachers” featured in the film mix the concept with that of Christianity. While many of them explain the idea (which most people actually believe to be the real explanation), as a tool to direct an incredibly powerful tool … the subconscious mind. And many of them have criticized Byrne since the release of the film, as she failed to leave out the most important part of the Law, which is of course ACTION.
I could write so much more, but basically what I am trying to say is that you have to seperate The Law of Attraction from the movie The Secret, they are not the same thing.
The Secret was flawed in many ways, but many people will benefit from it, if they use it as a springboard for further reading on the subject.

]]>